![]() |
|||||
| |
|||||
|
|||||
|
Seventy-seven percent (77%) of California voters passed Prop. 1A in 2006, sending an unequivocal mandate that they want the state sales tax on gas to fund only transportation and transit improvements. However, as the legislature grapples with a $15 billion budget deficit, some members of the legislature are once again talking about raiding gas tax funds. Here's why that would be irresponsible: Borrowing gas tax funds that must be repaid in three years is no way to fix a structural deficit. It only papers over the problem, plunges the state further into debt and increases costs to the state. Since Prop. 1A requires funds to be repaid within three years with interest, borrowing gas tax funds only "papers over" the budget deficit, digging our state deeper in the hole, increasing borrowing costs to the state and delaying real solutions. Raiding transportation and transit funds will eliminate thousands of jobs and stall economic growth at the worst possible time. One of the fundamental purposes of Prop. 1A and 1B was to use the money to smooth out the peaks and valleys of the economic cycle. At a time when housing construction is sagging, infrastructure projects are creating jobs in a sector that sorely needs them. Raiding transportation and transit funds will further destroy an already struggling industry and severely hamper any hope of an economic recovery. Maintaining transportation and transit funding keeps faith with the voters. With Prop. 42 in 2002 and again with Prop. 1A in 2006, California voters have made it clear that they do not want the state raiding funds intended for transportation and transit improvements. We cannot keep violating their trust.
916-443-0872
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
©2008 California Alliance for Jobs. All Rights Reserved.
|
|||||